By Audrey Hart
College football is
intermission for a couple weeks while everyone prepares for the bowl games.
That doesn’t mean there still isn’t plenty to talk about though. It’s time for
the post-season system failure.
![]() |
| (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio) |
The bowls were
announced last week to the general disappointment of everyone. Once again, the
BCS system has failed to match the best teams against one another and instead
has resulted in match ups between Florida State and Northern Illinois in the
Orange Bowl or unranked Wisconsin against Stanford in the Rose Bowl.
The Cotton Bowl,
which pits Texas A&M against Oklahoma has a better match up then those
games!
The problem is this
though; the BCS bowl selectors just followed the rules.
The rules of the selection process state that
if a team from a conference with non-automatic BCS bowl bid, such as, uh the
Mid-American Conference, finishes in the top 16 of the BCS rankings, and
outranks at least one conference champion with an automatic bid, then that team
gets a bowl slot. Which is how, after propelling themselves to No. 21 in the
rankings by beating No. 23 Kent State, Northern Illinois ended up in the Orange
Bowl. After Stanford pounded UCLA twice in one week, Nebraska was creamed by
Wisconsin, and Texas had a disappointing performance against Kansas State, the
NI Huskies ended up No. 15 and playing in the bowl.
Wisconsin’s
argument is much shorter. Simply, they won the automatic bid for the Rose Bowl
when they beat Nebraska in the Big 10 Championship.
ESPN’s Kirk
Herbstreit said it best, the BCS is in “a sad state for college football” right
now. The BCS was originally established to determine the national champion for
college football, while also showcasing the premier teams in the country to
enhance the bowl system. While that’s a great idea in theory, it’s hopelessly
flawed. I’m sure I’m not the only one who can’t wait for the bowl system.
(Pause for a moment
to reflect on the fact we could have had play off between Notre Dame, Alabama,
Oregon, and Florida.)
Point is, this
controversy is really quite uncontroversial. There was nothing in the system
that could have been done, kind of like Heisman trophy that will be presented
tonight.
Johnny Manziel is
by far the favorite for the trophy. His most impressive statistic though of
course, is his performance against Alabama. But everything else he did, his
yards, touchdowns, and highlights, were against second-rate teams like Sam
Houston State, South Carolina State, Southern Methodist, and Louisiana Tech.
Since it’s
traditionally an offensive award, you can expect him to win it. The true
description says though that the “trophy annually recognizes the outstanding
college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of
excellence with integrity.”
And that isn’t
Johnny Football. It’s the only player who led his team to an undefeated season,
Manti Te’o.
Notre Dame coach
Manti Te’o describes him as the “backbone” of the team. He had 103 tackles,
seven interceptions, and 11 passes defended. And he did this all against the
country’s hardest pre-season schedule, including eight tackles and two
interceptions against Michigan, 11 tackles against Stanford, 11 tackles and an
interception against Oklahoma, and five tackles and an interception against
USC.
He is the only
player that actually earned his Heisman spot from the first season to last, in
every single game.
Unfortunately, Te’o
will most likely not get the trophy. He walked away the other night with six
honors though, including the Maxwell Award as college football’s best player.
It is
understandable why Te’o won’t win, just as it makes sense why Northern Illinois
is in the Orange Bowl. System failure in college football is as traditional as
anything. Might as well look toward next year and move on. It all evens up in
the NFL. Just think, would you rather be Andrew Luck or Tim Tebow?




